Apple Podcasts video subscriptions are coming, and the hosting companies decide when
Apple said on 22 September that video is coming to Apple Podcasts Subscriptions. Creators will be able to sell subscriber-only video episodes, ad-free video, early access and bonus content to audiences in more than 170 countries and regions, on Apple devices and on the web. Apple gave no launch date and named no launch partners.
Read as a feature note it is small. Read as a position it is not. The company that runs podcasting’s default directory is about to let a show charge money for video inside the same app people already use for audio, in a business where the only realistic way to sell video to fans has been a YouTube membership or a Patreon page, both of them outside the podcast ecozystem entirely.
What Apple has actually confirmed
The announcement sits on Apple’s own creator site and runs to a few sentences. In its post, Apple says creators will be able to offer “subscriber-exclusive episodes, ad-free video, early access, and bonus content”, that audiences will find premium video across Apple devices and the web, and that it is “working with podcast hosting providers across the industry to make integration seamless”. Details from participating partners are promised in the coming months.
What Apple did not say carries as much weight. There is no launch date, no list of hosting companies that will support it on day one, no pricing, and no statement on whether a video subscription earns a creator the same share as an audio one. The word Apple uses is “soon”.
Everything else in circulation is trade coverage. MacRumors and 9to5Mac both wrote it up on 23 September, and neither added a term Apple had not already published. Our reading is that the vagueness is not evasion but dependency: the feature only works once hosting companies ship code Apple does not control, and Apple cannot promise a date on their behalf.
The hosting layer decides when this is real
Apple rebuilt video podcasts earlier this year. Instead of a video file attached to an item in an RSS feed, which is how video podcasts limped along for a decade, Apple moved to HTTP Live Streaming, the adaptive format behind most of the video people watch on a phone. It reached listeners at the end of March 2026 in iOS 26.4, first on iPhone, iPad, Apple Vision Pro and the web, later on Mac and Apple TV.
The practical gain for a publisher is that one upload serves both audiences. A single file streams as video to someone watching and as audio to someone listening, with no second feed to maintain and no split analytics.
Doing that requires the hosting company to encode and serve HLS, which is a real cost and a real engineering project. A partner list published on 16 March added Transistor, Audiomeans, PodBean, Captivate, RSS.com and Podigee to Acast, Omny Studio, ART19 and Simplecast.
Two of the largest hosts by episode volume, Libsyn and Spotify’s Megaphone, were not on that list. That is the detail to watch, because a show whose host has not shipped Apple HLS cannot publish video to Apple at all, free or paid. The likely effect is that video subscriptions arrive unevenly through 2027, host by host, rather than as a single switch on a single morning, and that the first shows to offer them will be the ones that happened to pick the right host two years ago.
What it costs a creator
Apple’s terms for podcast subscriptions are published and have not changed since 2021. On its own support page Apple says a creator receives 70 per cent of the subscription price at each billing cycle, minus applicable taxs, and that the share rises to 85 per cent once a subscriber has paid for a year. Joining the Apple Podcasters Program also carries an annual fee.
Set that beside the alternative. Patreon charges creators who joined after August 2025 a flat 10 per cent platform fee plus payment processing, and it has supported video for years. On price alone Apple is the expensive option in year one and roughly comparable by year two, and Apple has not said whether video changes that arithmetic.
What Apple is selling against that gap is friction. A Patreon video sits behind a second login, a second app and a second payment relationship. An Apple Podcasts subscription is bought in the app the listener already has, with a card Apple already holds, and the paid episodes appear in the same feed as the free ones. Our reading is that Apple is betting conversion beats commission, and for shows whose audience skews to Apple devices that bet is reasonable.
The audience has already stopped choosing
The timing is not accidental, because the audience research now points the same way. Acast’s Podcast Pulse 2026, published on 17 September and carried out by the research firm Differentology among 4,300 people aged 16 to 64 across 13 markets in August, found that 88 per cent of podcast fans consume both audio and video, up 10 points on last year, with 10 per cent audio only and 2 per cent video only.
The number that matters most for what Apple has just announced is a different one: 63 per cent of fans start an episode in one format and finish it in another. “The industry spent years arguing over formats, but audiences moved on long ago,” Greg Glenday, Acast’s chief executive, said in the release.
Take the Acast finding as the company’s own commissioned research rather than an independent audit, because it is. Even discounted, it describes the problem Apple’s single-file approach is built for. A subscriber who watches on the sofa and listens in the car does not want two entitlements, two downloads and two places to look, and any paid video product that forces that choice will feel broken within a week.
Scale is the part Apple leaves blank. Spotify told investors in May that more than 500 million users have streamed a video podcast, up nearly 50 per cent year over year. Apple has published no comparable figure for video in Apple Podcasts, and until it does, nobody outside Cupertino can size the audience a creator would be pricing against.
What it changes for shows and for listeners
For listeners, nothing is taken away. This adds a paid tier that did not exist, and free video podcasts in Apple Podcasts continue as they are. The change people will notice is that the bonus episode their favorite show has been selling on Patreon may start appearing in their podcast app instead, with the video attached.
For creators the interesting consequence is measurement. Money taken directly from a subscriber is counted in dollars, not in plays, which sidesteps the argument that has dominated the year: how a view is defined, who defines it, and whether the number moved because the audience grew or because the definition changed. That fight is still live, as our earlier look at how YouTube redefined a podcast view set out, and a subscription is the one revenue line it cannot touch.
That points to a narrower first wave than the announcement suggests. Paid video suits shows with something worth watching and a fanbase already used to paying: chat and comedy formats with a set, and the big conversational titles that fill any list of the most popular interview podcasts. A twice-weekly news briefing gains very little from a camera, and the cost of lighting, editing and storage does not fall just because Apple added a checkbox.
The open question is what Apple charges. If video subscriptions run on the same 70 and 85 per cent split as audio, this is a genuine competitor to a membership platform. If Apple prices video separately, or if hosting companies pass on the cost of encoding and serving HLS as a premium tier, the maths changes for everyone below the top of the charts. Apple has said nothing either way, and the answer will not arrive until the first hosting partners publish their own details in the coming months.
Posted in: All articles











